St Martin Hustings


Last night's hustings was different for sure.  We had barely sat in our places when the power failed.  The honorary police got out some battery powered lamps and we proceeded.  Of course the microphone and PA were not working, and since I had a very sore throat I found it hard going speaking clearly and loudly enough. Since I gave the speech that has a significant part about alternative energy and Samso, I was able to slip in a thank you  to the JEC for their timely and dramatic demonstration of the importance of secure energy supplies.

The questions we good too. Starting with Mr Falle who wanted to know how we would diversity the economy and remove barriers to entrepreneurship.  My response on diversification is to look at areas that leverage our existing investments in new area eg hosting MMORPG's that uses our good broadband and existing hosting skills. Doing recycling on island rather than shipping it. Aluminium looks a possibility - we don't do it because there is no local demand for aluminium so it has still to be shipped away. We don't have people doing light engineering in aluminium because it has to be brought in. Government needs to get both parties together to make the synergy happen. The other area, of course, is alternative power generation, particularly marine tidal and microgeneration systems.

On reducing barriers -the big one, deemed distribution that meant entrpreneurs had to pay tax on profits reinvested into the business is going in 16 months. The imbalance between 11k and local  people buildning a new busieness is also a problem. Not allowing French traders invited to a French market to sell goods labelled in French is an example of the silly bureaucracy that ought to go.

Someone asked about supporting agriculture. Stuart Syvret answered well before I had a chance and hit the nail on the head about the strategic importance of agriculture  in response to peak oil. Mr Le Gresley sesmt to think agriculture is in decline - parts are surely struggling but in fact overall it was almost the only the only part of the economy to show any sort of growth last year. Mr Bailhache thought it was all due to supermarket red tape. It isnt't in  John Hamon's case as he does not sell to  to supermarkets, but has still had his business hit badly.    I had already covered it in part in my opening speech, bat as almost the last person to answer the question I  had to point out it is not just land, you need to find a new generation of farmers, adnd you have to retain the knowledge and skills. Small,  part time smallholders like me may be the only short term option while people like John Hamon are not able to make a living in farming.

We were asked about the future of the Esplanade quarter masterplan. Almost all were against. I had to point out that when this came up in the hustings three years ago and I  thought it was a bad idea then. It is  an insane one now. A sunken road will be at risk of flooding as sea level rises continue, and will need repair and lighting paid for. Also the 400 homes won't even cover the additional 450 households we have grown since the last election because of the States policy of deliberately increasing the population by 150 households per year.


The last question from Mr Stone asked about the low quality of the States and why was  he was finding it hard to find 4 people on the platform to vote for. Predictably those candidates whose main plank for the election is constitutional reform took the opportunity to promote their projects.  I answered differently. I see the main problem being the lack of a coherent wide ranging  programme for government that people can vote for in the election as the problem. Of course individuals cannot cover it all. Secondary to that we cannot have effective debate between the candidates. For example,  I disagree with Mr Bailhache when he states that backbenchers should not bring unimportant propositions. It is not for him , or me, to decide what is or is not important. It is for the electorate to decide that, and lobby their representatives to change their ways, or come election time vote them out. That is the the democratic way.

2 comments:

Nick Palmer said...

The last question from Mr Stone asked about the low quality of the States and why was he was finding it hard to find 4 people on the platform to vote for

From our perspective I think the generally diabolical quality of most candidates, Senatorial and the Deputies, is down to the fact that the vast majority have no idea what the real situation we face is. Neither do the electorate. I might have a go at changing this but telling them that we can no longer afford to use the only methods that conventional economics knows - to go for unending growth - will be an uphill struggle.

When I was younger I thought you would just have to tell people the truth and they would think about it for a while, realise you likely had a point, then adjust their word view. I never suspected how intransigent, not to say bloody-minded, so many are if what you say is not to their liking or it conflicts with their wishful thinking...

Shipping News said...

The questions we good too. Starting with Mr Falle who wanted to know how we would diversity the economy and remove barriers to entrepreneurship.Anti Piracy Companies